Thursday 8 November 2012

The War On Innovation


 Nokia has been struggling for the past 2 or so years because of bad management decisions and increasing competition. They have released a lot of good phones that were either let down by software, hardware or even ecosystem. But now that they have got their act together. They have managed to surprise the world this September with a true gem. I'm talking about no other than the Lumia 920. A device that delivers on all fronts and even ups one or two at the tough competition. This is the first "complete" smartphone that Nokia has released in years, and I can't help but feel disappointed and even frustrated all thanks to a few well known tech blog reviews.


 It truly is a sad day when you finally see a device that ticks all of the right boxes get hammered by tech sites because of their lack of objectivity. On one hand, we have a device that offered nothing new to the table - with incremental improvements to the hardware components that gets praised like it was God sent. Not that the iPhone 5 is a bad device, but as a techno-geek who really loves fresh ideas and out of the box thinking, what's the big deal about the iPhone 5? Or more importantly, where's the innovation?

 The 920 is the first phone to come with Optical Image Stabilisation. Its one of the first devices to come with wireless charging coils built in. Its the first device to feature a 60 Hz refresh rate screen. Its the first device to offer a higher than HD resolution (1280 * 768). It's the first (or one of the first) device that can be operated using gloves, or anything really while having a capacitive touch screen. It's the second device (only after the 808) to come with Rich Audio recording which allows the phone to record audio to up to 140 decibels (you have to hear it to believe how much ahead of anything else it is) and yet reviewers are going out of their way to find any flaws and over exaggerate them in the readers' eyes. In the case of the 920, its the weight.


If you haven't had a chance to try the 920, I urge you to do so. The first thing you'll notice is that it is quite big and relatively heavy, but can be easily used without a problem and sits very nicely in the hand. But reading the reviews makes one imagine the device is almost impossible to operate because of the weight and might cause your arm to drop off in a few minutes! Ironically, the size of the 920 is barely bigger than the 900, and yet we didn't see complaints about that, despite the 920 actually being easier to hold! As a matter of fact, it has almost identical dimensions to the Galaxy S3  but is approximately 2 millimeters thicker, and we saw no complaints about the S3. Keep in mind that the 920 is made out of much better materials. If the 920 was made by a more favoured brand, a billion and one excuses would have been made, and the weight issue would have been downplayed or barely even mentioned while the review would completely focus on all the innovations that were introduced in this device. Just wait till Apple releases half of the things that are already found on the 920, and watch the reviewers bow down and endlessly praise their brilliance. Remember this last sentence very well, because in a year's time, you'll see it for yourself.



 I'd really appreciate that every device gets its fair review. Praise the (Insert any device here) all you like, but for some self proclaimed journalists to bash the Lumia 920 for ridiculous things - some without any fact checking and giving it bogus scores; I find that completely unacceptable. You love the lightening connector because its so convenient but hate wireless charging? You think no one should buy it because its too damn heavy? 185 grams is too damn heavy? (Yet your iPhone 4S had a case that made it weigh just as much). You didn't see any improvements in low light performance and video stabilisation and think its a gimmick? You think the Nexus 4's camera doesn't come close to the 920's but yet still give them the same score on camera?!?! I can find a lot more by simply reading through some of those reviews. Double standards at their finest.

 If Nokia fails, then no one can dare say it was because they didn't try. They have built a device with a list of innovations bigger than all of their recent competitors' flagships combined. But it seems like these days, no matter what you do, if you have the wrong logo on your device, you will not get the praise you truly deserve. A shame really, because we need devices like the 920 to raise the bar, and to make sure great companies don't rest on laurels.

Please gsmarena, don't disappoint me. 

4 comments:

  1. Brilliant....absolutely brilliant...all negative criticisms about the 920 are pure rubbish. This is the best smartphone ever made..Period!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, screw those so-called technical reviews( I mean those biased!), they are nothing but rubbish!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is nothing "technical" about them. All they say is that the 920 is heavy blah blah blah. If you look at the reactions of almost everyone who got one, they'll repeat my same words. It feels awesome in the hand. Much better than the 900 to hold, and no one complained about that!

      Delete
  3. yang komentarin nokia 808 dan 920 jelek kan org2 yg goblog yg belum nypbain punya tapi udah komentar yang jelek2. padahal di web banyak sekali komparasi tentang 2 nokia tersebut dengan iphone, samsung dan htc. dan siapa pemenangnya? NOKIA! AND I'M NOKIANS TOO, SAYA SUDAH PUNYA DAN PUAS SEKALI MEMAKAI 808 PUREVIEW!

    ReplyDelete